Last modified: 2011-04-02 by zoltán horváth
Keywords: office of the high representative | european union special representative | ohr |
Links: FOTW homepage | search | disclaimer and copyright | write us | mirrors
image by Eugene Ipavec, 12 August 2007
There is a new OHR flag hanging
right outside the OHR building in Sarajevo. I believe it had the Bosnian map
outlined and a bunch of laurel leaves with the inscription "OHR" on it.
Muhamed Mesic, 13 November 2002
A (very large) photo of it can be seen at
laurel wreath is an odd copper color.
Eugene Ipavec, 12 August 2007
I have one small observation and that is that the photograph of the Admiral
and the HR/EUSR shows the lettering beneath the logo to be in a Times Roman Bold
font. This is not a United Nations institution, but an ad hoc
international one, established by the The General Framework Agreement for Peace
in Bosnia and Herzegovina, commonly known as the Dayton Peace Accords or
Dayton-Paris Peace Accords of 14 December 1995. The United Nations, UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR), UN High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) are members of the Peace Implementation Council (PIC) - and formerly UN
Transitional Administration of Eastern Slavonia (UNTAES) - comprising fifty-five
countries and agencies, but no UN institutions are members of the Steering Board
of the PIC and the UNHCR is a permanent member of the Board of Principals.
Furthermore, from February 2002, the European Union's General Affairs Council (GAC) appointed the High Representative the EU's Special Representative (EUSR), which is a position held concurrently. Thus, when acting as the EUSR, it is very much a European Union institution and not a United Nations one.
Source: Office of the High Representative and European Union Special
Representative (OHR/EUSR), web site, http://www.ohr.int, consulted 12 August
Colin Dobson, 12 August 2007
Here are some photos of OHR flag, here it can be seen that there is no
inscription "Office of the High Representative" below letters OHR, only a line:
Aleksandar Nemet, 24 June 2009
It is impossible to say for sure that there is no inscription, given the
available evidence, from the official web site. At best, it would be possible to
say that there are two or three variants in use. I checked the 2009 and 2008
photographs on the official web site, but there is no clear image of the flag.
The best I could come up with was this one:
only just about shows the top of the letter 'O'.
It is quite clear from the photograph of the Admiral, dated July 2007 that certainly at that date, a flag bearing the inscription was used, so I'd be very wary of saying that the official flag is without an inscription and that it is better to make clear, as I have cited, that there are a number of variants in use between the relevant dates. Eugene's image uses a dark grey / black line, for the outline of the map, but some photographs show it in blue:
although it is very hard to tell in most photographs, due to the fact that the subject is not the flag, but the visiting dignitary.
Colin Dobson, 24 June 2009