
Last modified: 2023-06-10 by  zachary harden
 zachary harden
Keywords: olympic games | berlin | 
Links: FOTW homepage |
search | 
disclaimer and copyright | 
write us | 
mirrors
National flags at the Summer Olympics, 1936, Berlin:
General remark on ease of identification of national flags:
There are quite a number 
	  of photographs showing flags; however, not all of them are as easily 
	  identifiable on a b/w photograph and not fully unfurled. I found the 
	  following flags strikingly easy to identify: USA, Japan, Iceland, 
	  Panama, Chile, China, South Africa, Philippines, Germany, Union Jacks 
	  (generic)/Red Ensigns (generic)
Slightly less easy were:
Uruguay, Italy, Brazil, Egypt, Turkey, Portugal, Switzerland, Hungary, Latvia, Colombia, Mexico
	This is of course a totally subjective 
	  categorization based on a non-random sample of photographs. As the 
	  flags usually were arranged in an alphabetic order, some parts of the 
	  alphabet are systematically underrepresented, mostly due to the 
	  position of the photographers.
Other flag usage:
	
1. At the Brandenburger Tor there were also German city flags on display, all of them in hanging form, of course. 
- Kaiserslautern [4, 
	  special edition, p. 3]: red-white with the arms in the white banner-head. 
see
http://kommunalflaggen.de/dbres/images/photos/diewoche-kaiserslautern.jpg 
- probably Frankfurt am Main [2, p. 5]: white-red with the arms in the white banner-head
- probably Wiesbaden [2, p. 5]: blue-yellow with the 
	  arms in the white banner-head; the b/w photo looks strange, though, as 
	  the (yellow) fleurs-de-lis are appearing darker than the (blue) field 
	  of the arms.
2. Little flags were used for (most probably) marking 
	  the current records in long jumping: one Olympic flag and one flag 
	  showing a
depiction of the globe on a white field [2, p. 46].
	Sources:
[1] Walter Richter et al. (1936) Die Olympischen Spiele 1936 in Berlin und Garmisch-Partenkirchen Band 1. 
	  Cigaretten-Bilderdienst Altona-Bahrenfeld.
[2] Walter Richter et al. 
	  (1936) Die Olympischen Spiele 1936 in Berlin und Garmisch-Partenkirchen 
	  Band 2. Cigaretten-Bilderdienst Altona-Bahrenfeld.
[3] Franz Miller 
	  et al. (1936) So kämpfte und siegte die Jugend der Welt: XI. Olympiade 
	  Berlin 1936. München (Knorr & Hirth).
[4] photographs in illustrated 
	  magazine "Die Woche", 1936.
[5] photograph in: Völkischer Beobachter 
	  24 Juli 1936
M. Schmöger, 4 October 2009
  image located by Esteban Rivera, 06 August 2011
 
image located by Esteban Rivera, 06 August 2011
Earlier today, I was idly browsing through You Tube when I came across the 
following 
link.
At 2.34 minutes or thereabouts, you will see flying what appears to me to be the 
flag of the Governor of Jamaica. I am no student of Olympic history and do not 
know whether the Jamaicans took part in this Olympiad, but even if they did, 
this flag must surely have been hoisted in error.  
Peter Johnson, 05 August 2011
I'd like to share with you the image displayed at
this link. This appears to show four defaced Union Flags in addition to the 
undefaced flag of the United Kingdom. One of these must clearly be that of the 
Indian Empire, but what could the other three be? Alas, I cannot zoom in closer 
on this image. Further to my last message, I now gather from Wikipedia that 
Jamaica did not send a team to the 1936 Olympics. Curiouser and curiouser.
Peter Johnson, 08 August 2011
I'm no expert on British flags, but from what I can read on the
image posted, it says that the four defaced Union Jack flags are (from top 
to bottom):
- Malta
- Bermuda
- United Kingdom (GB)
- India
- Jamaica (In this case, you mention Jamaica did not participate, but on the 
postcard the name "Jamaica" is clearly seen).
Esteban Rivera, 08 August 2011
Before anyone starts jumping up and down saying "Wikipedia must be wrong", 
it's intersting to note that Wikipedia lists 49 competing nations (th no 
Jamaica), and other soures (such as N. Blundell and D.
Mackay's massice tome "The History of the Olympics") also list 49 competing 
nations - as does 
this Wikipedia page. So either publicity for the games included Jamaica, who 
later pulled out (possible) or Wikipedia's list accidentally excludes Jamaica 
but includes another country hich did not attend (also possible). The former is 
more likely though, given that
Wikipedia and
www.olympic.org list all the competing 
athletes on subpages - and  none of them seems to be Jamaican.
I do note, though, that Jamaica's Olympics Committee was officially recognised 
in 1936 - could it be that this is the reason the flag was present? Maybe all 
countries with Olympics committees had flags at the games, whether they had sent 
a team or not?
James Dignan, 09 August 2011
The organisers of the 1936 Olympics appear to have regarded the respective 
Governors' flags as those of the participating colonies themselves.
All the hard work put into the various German flaggenbuchs seems to have been in 
vain.
Peter Johnson, 09 August 2011
I do wonder whether that was any more "wrong" than any of the alternative 
flags. The red ensign seems to have been used for the countries where it was 
authorised as a civil ensign, and for the other three the choice would be 
between an unofficial civil ensign, a government ensign or the defaced UJ.
Jonathan Dixon, 10 August 2011
http://www.axisimagebunker.com/store/products/436-flags-of-participating-countries-1936.aspx
Considering that the post card shows 53 flags, with 49 participating countries, 
this last explanation would seem the most likely.
Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 29 August 2011
  
![[OG pennant]](../images/o/oly@1936bp.jpg) located by Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 19 April 2012
 
located by Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 19 April 2012
Photograph from Hobbys Wood Militaria
Visible at
http://www.hobbyswoodmilitaria.co.uk/german-berlin-1936-olympic-flag-pennant-ref--2577-1250-p.asp: 
"German 1936 Olympic Flag Pennant (Ref# 2577), 30cm long white linen pennant 
with the five Olympic rings embroidered on. The metal spring clips are rusty, 
otherwise in very good condition" 
(No copyright claimed, but also no permission for reuse obtained.)
Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 19 April 2012