
Last modified: 2018-08-08 by rob raeside
Keywords: ontario | niagara-on-the-lake | 
Links: FOTW homepage |
search | 
disclaimer and copyright | 
write us | 
mirrors
![[Queenston 1812, Ontario]](../images/c/ca-onnol.gif) image 
located by Peter Edwards, 14 July 2018
 image 
located by Peter Edwards, 14 July 2018See also:
Flag: Rectangle 1:2. Blue field superimposed in upper hoist quarter by the 
Royal Union Flag of 1707 and in the fly by the shield of the town’s armorial 
bearings.
"In January 2013, Lord Mayor Dave Eke approached the Heraldic 
Authority about the creation of a Town flag. . . . Upon approval from Town 
Council in March 2013, the Chief Herald’s office was formally petitioned to 
produce a historically recognized Coat of Arms and flag. . . . On December 10, 
2013, exactly 200 years to the day of the Burning of Niagara in 1813, Lord Mayor 
Dave Eke and the Right Reverend Ralph D. Spence, Albion Herald Extraordinary, 
officially unveiled the Town’s grant of armorial bearings, which includes the 
new Coat of Arms, flag, and military badge."
Source:
https://notl.civicweb.net
Peter Edwards, 14 July 2018
![[Queenston 1812, Ontario]](../images/c/ca-on-qtn1812.jpg) image located by 
Valentin Poposki, 9 July 2011
 image located by 
Valentin Poposki, 9 July 2011
Bicentennial flag design causes problems. Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake, 
Ontario:
http://www.niagarathisweek.com/news/cityhall/article/1278369--flag-design-causes-problems. 
A banner-like flag is criticized for being too much like a banner, and not 
enough like a flag.
Valentin Poposki, 9 July 2011
The point of disagreement being a "blue banner", blue flywise stripe of one 
sixth (or less) of the hoist in height, that runs over most of the flag, bearing 
text "Niagara-on-the-Lake" in white, or in a different flag with a closely 
related design "Queenston". One side want that "banner" removed because they 
feel it makes the flag too banner-like, presumable because the "banner" doesn't 
fit in with the rest of the flag, and the other doesn't want to remove it, 
probably because the scheme of two flags differing in the name would break down 
if they did.
Peter Hans van den Muijzenberg, 22 November 2012