
This page is part of © FOTW Flags Of The World website
A History of Yacht Club White Ensigns (United Kingdom)
Last modified: 2012-01-21 by rob raeside
Keywords: royal yacht squadron | white ensign | 
Links: FOTW homepage |
search | 
disclaimer and copyright | 
write us | 
mirrors
See also:
Recreational sailing in the English Channel became possible when the Napoleonic 
Wars ended in 1815. At this time the Red Ensign was not only the merchant 
ensign, but also the senior naval ensign and, with a badge in the fly, the 
ensign of vessels belonging to public departments. The White Ensign was the 
ensign of the next most senior naval squadron. The Blue Ensign, the junior naval 
ensign, was also flown by some Admiralty transports and, with a badge in the 
fly, by Customs cutters when in pursuit.
The Yacht Club was formed on 1 
June 1815 and "adopted a plain white burgee, with which should be worn, as 
ensign, a white flag with the Union in the upper corner of the hoist". This 
resembled the naval White Ensign, but was not authorised. Most yachts were 
cutters or brigs, and when flying the Red Ensign were indistinguishable from 
merchant ships and fishing vessels. Any ensign that was different to the Red 
Ensign was going be used if possible. There was an advantage if it made yachts 
look like a naval vessels, since the latter ususally received favourable 
treatment in foreign ports.
The Prince Regent, who was a member of the 
club, became King George IV in 1820 and granted the club the title 'Royal'. At 
about the same time the 'white flag with Union' was replaced by the Red Ensign. 
Without any known authorisation the letters R.Y.C. were added to the Red Ensign 
in 1824, and in 1829 the Admiralty issued a warrant to each of the one hundred 
and fifteen yachts owned by club members authorising, "a St George's or white 
ensign to be worn on board '....' so long as that vessel shall belong to a 
member of the Royal Yacht Club".
David Prothero, 7 January 2008
In 1831 three more clubs were granted a special ensign; "a blue ensign" for the 
Royal Northern, a White Ensign with the arms of Ireland in the lower fly for the
Royal Irish, and a Red Ensign, "the Union (with 
the harp and crown on a green field in the centre) in the corner" for the 
Royal Cork. Unlike the Royal Yacht Club, these clubs were not issued with individual 
warrants for each vessel owned by a club member, but with one warrant which 
covered "the respective vessels belonging to the club".
The following 
year the Admiralty refused to grant a green ensign that was requested by the 
Royal Western of Ireland. The club was offered the choice of one that was red, 
white or blue and chose an ensign, "white with red cross; a crown in the centre 
surrounded by a wreath of shamrock, and an union at the head of the ensign". 
Flag 655 in Steenbergen.
Over the next eight years more special ensigns 
were granted:
1834 Royal Western of 
Plymouth; "Ensign - White with red cross, a crown in the centre, surrounded with 
a wreath of roses, intertwined with oak leaves, and a union at the head of
the ensign."
1835  
	Royal Thames; "An Union Jack and crown with the letters 
R.T.Y.C. in red." This is the complete description but I assume that it should 
have been preceeded by 'on a white flag'.
1836  
	Royal Eastern; "Ensign, blue."
1837 Gibraltar; "White ensign."
1840 Wharncliffenote; "Ensign - Plain white with 
an union in the corner."
1840  
	Royal Southampton; "A white ensign, with the 
crown and Southampton arms in the centre."
After eleven years, special ensigns were 
white for English clubs and Irish clubs, apart from Royal Cork which probably 
chose a defaced Red Ensign for sentimental reasons connected with the 18th 
century Water Club of Cork, and blue for Scottish clubs.
David Prothero, 
8 January 2008
Note: The 
Wharncliffe Sailing Club has always been a mystery as the only place in Britain 
named Wharncliffe is near Sheffield with nothing better than a small reservoir 
on which to sail. James Liston has found that the name refers not to a place but 
a person; James Archibald Stuart- Wortley-Mackenzie, 1st Baron Wharncliffe.
"The Wharncliffe Club was established in 1839, for the promotion of sailing in 
squadron on the Thames, under the command of the noble commodore, Lord 
Wharncliffe. The yachts rendezvous, from May to July, opposite the Club House, 
Wates's Hotel, Gravesend; and the lovers of this amusement are weekly gratified 
by seeing some eight or ten beautifully-constructed vessels, from twenty to 
thirty tons, sailing in company
out to sea. " [The Sporting Review, 1842 ]
David Prothero, 1 March 2008
In the early 1840s the Royal Yacht Squadron, as the Royal Yacht Club had been 
named after 1833, frequently complained to the Admiralty and to the Foreign 
Office about the improper conduct abroad of members of other yacht clubs, who 
were mistakenly assumed to be members of the Royal Yacht Squadron. The Commodore 
of the Royal Yacht Squadron, the Earl of Yarborough, asked the Admiralty to 
grant the Squadron sole permission to carry the White Ensign, and suggested 
"that the other British and Irish clubs should have a warrant to
carry a Blue 
Ensign with the wreath or harp they now have in their White Ensign".
The 
Admiralty adopted this suggestion and wrote to six clubs on 22 July 1842 
cancelling their White Ensign warrants and replacing them with warrants for Blue 
Ensigns defaced with the distinguishing mark of the club, observing in its 
covering letter that, "as it is an ensign not allowed to be worn by merchant 
vessels, my Lords trust that it will be equally acceptable to the members of the 
club". The Royal Western of Plymouth is the only club recorded as having 
objected to the change. Based upon its use of the White Ensign, the club had 
negotiated special arrangements with port authorities overseas, and asked for 
time in which to tell the Ministers of fifteen foreign countries about the 
change to their ensign. The Admiralty allowed the club to retain its White 
Ensign until the end of the year, and also agreed to the club's request, made 
later in the same year, for a plain Blue Ensign instead of a defaced Blue 
Ensign.
David Prothero, 9 January 2008
Mistakes were made when the letters cancelling the White Ensign warrants were 
written. One was sent to the Royal Eastern that did not have a White Ensign, and 
the Admiralty failed to write to two clubs that did have White Ensigns, the 
Royal Irish and the Royal Western of Ireland. That of the former was replaced by 
a defaced Blue Ensign in 1846, but that of the latter continued to be used. In 
June 1849 the club asked whether this was correct, and was told by the 
Admiralty that their White Ensign had not been withdrawn. Four years later the 
club realised that although all other clubs with a special ensign had been 
issued with individual yacht warrants, none had been issued for the yachts of 
the Royal Western of Ireland. On 26 March 1853 the club therefore presented 
the Admiralty with a list of the yachts of its members, and requested a warrant 
for each one. This time the Admiralty replied that permission to carry the White 
Ensign had been withdrawn in July 1842. The club, they said, had not been 
contacted at that time because there had been no applications from the club for 
any yacht warrants, and consequently the existence of the club had been 
overlooked. This ignored the fact that none of the other clubs whose White 
Ensign had been withdrawn in 1842 had ever been issued with yacht warrants, 
which were not introduced, for clubs other than the Royal Yacht Squadron, until 
September 1844. When this was later pointed out, the Admiralty then claimed that 
it had not written separately to the Royal Western of Ireland as it thought that 
the club was part of the Royal Western of Plymouth. This was clearly incorrect 
as separately letters granting White Ensign warrants to both the Royal Western 
of Plymouth and the Royal Western of Ireland were among correspondence which the 
Admiralty was later ordered to deposit with the House of Commons.
The 
Royal Western of Ireland protested that the club should not be deprived of the 
right to wear the White Ensign and made to suffer for the mistakes of Admiralty 
officials. The Admiralty reversed its decision and issued the club with a new 
general warrant and ninety-eight yacht warrants. The Earl of Wilton, Commodore 
of the Royal Yacht Squadron, expressed his regret at the Admiralty's decision. 
He wrote that the Royal Western of Ireland compared most unfavourably with the 
Royal Yacht Squadron and he hoped that the Admiralty would reverse its decision. 
A vote on the matter in the House of Commons led to the Royal Western of Ireland 
retaining the White Ensign.
David Prothero, 10 January 2008
Between 1842 and 1857 another thirteen clubs had been granted special ensigns, 
four plain Blue Ensigns, seven defaced Blue Ensigns, one defaced Red Ensign and 
one Red Ensign defaced on the Union. In 1847 applications for the White Ensign 
from the Royal Bermuda and the Royal St George of Dublin were refused, as was an 
application from the Royal Irish in March 1849. However when the Marquis of 
Conyngham, Commodore of the Royal St George, applied for a White Ensign warrant 
in June 1858 on the grounds that it was no longer exclusively the ensign of the 
Royal Yacht Squadron, he was told by the Admiralty that the warrant granted to 
the Royal Western of Ireland would be withdrawn. The Royal Western of Ireland 
was informed of this on 26 June, and issued with a new warrant for a Blue Ensign 
"with the distinctive marks as hitherto worn on the White Ensign". The secretary 
of the Royal Western of Ireland wrote that a large proportion of the club's 
members were away on foreign cruises and asked the Admiralty to suspend its 
decision until a meeting of members could be arranged to consider the matter. 
The Admiralty replied that its decision was final, but agreed that the White 
Ensign warrants would remain in force until 31 December 1858.
In November 
1858 the Admiralty received a petition from the club asking the Admiralty to 
reconsider its decision. It had been forward by the Earl of Eglintoun & Winton, 
Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, and patron of the club. He observed that it was 
questionable whether the privilege should have been granted in the first place, 
but that having been granted it was not unreasonable for the club to complain if 
the privilege was now removed. The petition, signed by 153 members, referred to 
the club's involvement in the development of fisheries in Ireland and its offer 
of assistance when the formation of a volunteer coastal defence force had been 
considered. It concluded; "Your memorialists humbly submit that they have not 
merited the marked disgrace of being deprived of a flag they have carried and 
worn for twenty-six years, and a time-honoured and deeply prized privilege. 
Irrespective of this disgrace upon an Irish club, your memorialists have 
advanced considerable sums of money, their security being their flag, and which 
will become totally lost to them. The change of flag alone will involve the 
yacht owners of the club in a pecuniary loss of fourteen hundred pounds. Your 
memorialists regretfully submit, and at the same time most humbly and 
respectfully, that if your Lordships think proper to deny them the prayer of 
this their memorial, the dissolution of this club will at once take place, as 
they cannot accept any other flag."
On 20 December 1858 the Admiralty 
informed the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland that although dissolution of the Royal 
Western of Ireland would be regretted, an exception in favour of the club could 
not be made without reversing the decision of 1842 and thus allowing all yacht 
clubs that had once worn the White Ensign to wear it again.
David 
Prothero, 11 January 2008
The matter was again raised in Parliament, and in April 1859 the Admiralty were 
ordered to send to the House of Commons all correspondence relating to yacht 
clubs and the White Ensign. In the same month the Royal Western of Ireland 
presented another petition to the Admiralty, this time signed by thirty-six 
Members of Parliament. The Admiralty replied that they could not give an answer 
"as papers have been moved for in the House of Commons". A resolution of the 
matter was delayed by the dissolution of Parliament followed by a General 
Election on 31 May. The governing Whig party was re-elected and the Royal 
Western of Ireland re-submitted the petition that had been signed by Members of 
Parliament. The Admiralty once again replied that it was not possible to give an 
answer until the subject had been considered in Parliament.
The Royal Western of Ireland represented itself as an Irish equivalent of the British 
Royal Yacht Squadron, and therefore entitled to comparable treatment with 
respect to flags, but this was not correct. Members of the Irish club owned 122 
yachts, but only 41 were from Irish ports. The Irish yachts were generally small 
with an aggregate tonnage of 890, while most of the English, Scottish and Welsh 
yachts were twice as large with an aggregate tonnage of 4,798. The secretary the 
Royal Western of Ireland was in the habit of writing to the owners of yachts 
belonging to other clubs describing the flag of the club and offering membership 
to anyone not resident in Ireland for a two guinea entrance fee and annual 
subscription of two guineas. It enabled owners, that were unable to become 
members of the Royal Yacht Squadron, the privilege of wearing the White Ensign. 
The House of Commons voted to uphold the Admiralty's decision to restrict the 
White Ensign, as a yacht club ensign, to the Royal Yacht Squadron. 
[Parliamentary Paper 1859, III, Sess,2 in National Archives (PRO) Microfiche 
65.230.]
David Prothero, 12 January 2008
Did the 
Royal Western Yacht Club of Ireland indeed dissolve, either because their 
members didn't want to change the club's ensign, or because their only reason 
for being members was being allowed to use a white ensign?
Peter Hans Van 
den Muijzenberg, 13 January 2008
The name has just been (re-)adopted 
by the Western YC whose history says that the RWIYC ceased to exist in the early 
1860s. (http://www.westernyachtclub.com/cms/index.php?page=club-history) 
Separately I found that in 1884 the club's premises were sold in connection with 
a civil action at law. The original club's signal flags can be seen at
http://www.westernyachtclub.com/cms/index.php?page=club-archive-2.
David Prothero, 
13 January 2008